4.7 Article

Cardiac output by Modelflow® method from intra-arterial and fingertip pulse pressure profiles

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 365-369

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20030303

关键词

cycling exercise; cardiac output; intra-arterial pressure; pulse pressure analysis; Modelflow (R); stroke volume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modelflow(R), when applied to non-invasive fingertip pulse pressure recordings, is a poor predictor of cardiac output (Q litre - min(-1)). The use of constants established from the aortic elastic characteristics, which differ from those of finger arteries, may introduce signal distortions, leading to errors in computing Q. We therefore hypothesized that peripheral recording of pulse pressure profiles undermines the measurement of Q with Modelflow(R), so we compared Modelflow(R) beat-by-beat Q values obtained simultaneously non-invasively from the finger and invasively from the radial artery at rest and during exercise. Seven subjects (age, 24.0 +/- 2.9 years; weight, 81.2 +/- 12.6 kg) rested, then exercised at 50 and 100 W, carrying a catheter with a pressure head in the left radial artery and the photoplethysmographic cuff of a finger pressure device on the third and fourth fingers of the contralateral hand. Pulse pressure from both devices was recorded simultaneously and stored on a PC for subsequent Q computation. The mean values of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure at rest and exercise steady state were significantly (P < 0.05) lower from the finger than the intra-arterial catheter. The corresponding mean steady-state Q obtained from the finger (Q(porta)) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that computed from the intra-arterial recordings (O-pia). The line relating beat-by-beat Q(porta) and Q(pia) was y = 1.55x - 3.02 (r(2) = 0.640). The bias was 1.44 litre - min(-1) and the precision was 2.84 litre (.) min(-1). The slope of this line was significantly higher than 1, implying a systematic overestimate of Q by Qporta with respect to Q(pia). Consistent with the tested hypothesis, these results demonstrate that pulse pressure profiles from the finger provide inaccurate absolute Q values with respect to the radial artery, and therefore cannot be used without correction with a calibration factor calculated previously by measuring Q with an independent method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据