4.3 Article

A 1 year follow-up study of the consequences of Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients:: unchanged frequency of erosive oesophagitis and decreased prevalence of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200404000-00001

关键词

gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; Helicobacter pylori eradication; duodenal ulcer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aim Discussions concerning the increased incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) after Helicobacter pylori eradication continue. In this study we aimed to evaluate the presence of coexisting GORD in (1) duodenal ulcer patients after successful H. pylori eradication, (2) patients with persistent H. pylori infection after attempts at eradication, and (3) controls in whom H. pylori eradication had not been attempted. Methods A prospective study of 255 patients with duodenal ulcer who were assigned to H. pylori eradication or to control treatment (omeprazole for 4 weeks) and followed up for 1 year or until peptic ulcer relapse. GORD was determined in the patients who had reflux oesophagitis on endoscopy at the beginning of the study and/or in patients without reflux oesophagitis if they experienced heartburn and/or regurgitation at least twice a week associated with impairment of daily activities. Results The study revealed a significant decrease (from 44.6% to 21.7%; P < 0.001) of patients with GORD at the end of the follow-up among those in whom H. pylori eradication had been successful. There was no significant difference in the frequency of reflux oesophagitis before and after the follow-up regardless of H. pylori status. Conclusions H. pylori eradication did not significantly influence the prevalence and incidence of reflux oesophagitis in patients with duodenal ulcer during a 1 year follow-up period, but there was a significantly lower prevalence of GORD after successful H. pylori eradication, as patients with non-erosive GORD had been cured.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据