4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

New insights into the cytotoxic mechanisms of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin

期刊

ANAEROBE
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 107-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2003.11.004

关键词

Clostridium perfringens; enterotoxin; cytotoxicity; apoptosis; oncosis; tight junctions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clostridium perfringens type A isolates producing the 35 kDa enterotoxin (CPE) are an important cause of food poisoning, human non-foodborne gastrointestinal (GI) disease, and some veterinary GI diseases. Studies using CPE knock-out mutants confirmed the importance of enterotoxin expression for the enteric virulence of CPE-positive type A isolates. CPE action involves formation of a series of complexes in mammalian plasma membranes. One such CPE-containing complex (of similar to 155 kDa) is important for the induction of plasma membrane permeability alterations, which are responsible for killing enterotoxin-treated mammalian cells. Those membrane permeability changes damage the epithelium, allowing the enterotoxin to interact with the tight junction (TJ) protein occludin. CPE:occludin interactions result in formation of an similar to 200 kDa CPE complex and internalization of occludin into the cytoplasm. That removal of occludin (and possibly other proteins) damages TJs and disrupts the normal paracellular permeability barrier of the intestinal epithelium, which may contribute to CPE-induced diarrhea. Recent studies demonstrated that low CPE doses kill mammalian cells by inducing a classic apoptotic pathway involving mitochondrial membrane depolarization. cytochrome C release. and caspase 3/7 activation. In contrast, high enterotoxin doses induce oncosis, a proinflammatory event. Thus. inflammation play also contribute to the GI symptoms of patients whose intestines contain high CPE levels. In summary, CPE is a unique. multifunctional toxin with cytotoxic, TJ-damaging, and (probably) proinflammatory activities. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据