4.7 Article

Ethnic differences in the linkage disequilibrium and distribution of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 35 candidate genes for cardiovascular diseases

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 83, 期 4, 页码 559-565

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2003.09.008

关键词

single-nucleotide polymorphism; ethnicity; chinese; European; allele frequency; linkage disequilibrium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are commonly used to study genetics for common diseases and predict pharmacological response. The selection of likely informative SNPs in association studies depends on their allele frequencies and on the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs, both of which may show interethnic differences. Among three populations consisting of 207 Chinese, 858 French, and 395 Spanish, we compared the allele frequency distributions of 64 intragenic SNPs of 35 candidate genes for cardiovascular diseases. Twenty-eight of these SNPs from 12 genes were also examined for intragenic LD. About 20% of SNPs were restricted to Europeans. being monomorphic in Chinese, among them mostly nonsynonymous coding SNPs and noncoding SNPs. Only 1.6% of SNPs were specific in Chinese.. commensurate with the detection of these SNPs almost exclusively in Caucasians. Similarly, these SNPs were more often rare (<0.1 minor allele frequency) in Chinese (44.3%) than in Europeans (31.1%). The variant allele frequencies and intermarker LDs in terms of D' and Delta(2) were highly correlated between French and Spanish populations (r = 0.98-0.99, p < 0.001). However, only moderate correlations of allele frequencies and D' were found between the Chinese and the European populations (r = 0.7 and 0.3, respectively) despite a high correlation of Delta(2) values (r = 0.8). These results suggest that ethnic considerations are important in the selection of SNPs for association studies of candidate genes, as this may affect the power of the study as well as the likelihood of asking relevant questions and getting medically meaningful answers. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据