4.6 Article

Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith model for estimating soybean evapotranspiration

期刊

IRRIGATION SCIENCE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-003-0087-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Penman-Monteith model with a variable surface canopy resistance (r(cv)) was evaluated to estimate hourly and daily crop evapotranspiration (ETc) over a soybean canopy for different soil water status and atmospheric conditions. The hourly values of r(cv) were computed as a function of environmental variables (air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, net radiation) and a normalized soil water factor (F), which varies between 0 (wilting point, theta(WP)) and 1 (field capacity, theta(FC)). The performance of the Penman-Monteith model (ETPM) was evaluated using hourly and daily values of ETc obtained from the combined aerodynamic method (ETR). On an hourly basis, the overall standard error of estimate (SEE) and the absolute relative error (ARE) were 0.06 mm h(-1) (41 W m(-2)) and 4.2%, respectively. On a daily basis, the SEE was 0.47 mm day(-1) and the ARE was 2.5%. The largest disagreements between ETPM and ETR were observed, on the hourly scale, under the combined influence of windy and dry atmospheric conditions. However, this did not affect daily estimates, since nighttime underestimations cancelled out daytime overestimations. Thus, daily performances of the Penman-Monteith model were good under soil water contents ranging from 0.31 to 0.2 (theta(FC) and theta(WP) being 0.33 and 0.17, respectively) and LAI ranging from 0.3 to 4.0. For this validation period, calculated values of r(cv) and F ranged between 44 s m(-1) and 551 s m(-1) and between 0.19 and 0.88, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据