4.4 Article

Specific ultrarush desensitization in Hymenoptera venom-allergic patients

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 409-413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61775-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hymenoptera venom hypersensitivity is an epidemiologically important problem. The only effective treatment in the management of venom-allergic patients with a history of generalized reactions to insect sting is specific immunotherapy. Objective: To demonstrate safety and effectiveness of a modified ultrarush desensitization protocol in venom-allergic patients. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy underwent a specific 1-day ultrarush desensitization by the subcutaneous route, reaching the cumulative dose of 101.1 mug in 2.5 hours. The maintenance dose (100 mug) was administered after 15 days and thereafter once a month. Patients were followed up for a year. Antihistamines were withheld for 15 days before and during desensitization to not underestimate the incidence of adverse effects. Results: All patients but I completed the ultrarush desensitization. (This patient discontinued the treatment because of a hypertensive crisis not related to the desensitization.) The treatment caused a rapid variation of immunological parameters (IgE, IgG4) since the 15th day. After the desensitization, skin prick test results became negative in 15 patients (27%, decrease of 3.5 log), whereas they decreased in 14 patients (25%, decrease of 1 log). Sixty-four percent showed no adverse effects. Only 7% had a mild systemic reaction. Conclusions: Ultrarush desensitization is an effective and safe therapy in the management of patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy. In fact, it provides a faster tolerance, without significant differences regarding incidence of severe adverse effects, compared with traditional and rush protocols. It can be adopted for all patients, even children and teenagers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据