4.4 Review

The multiple actions of black widow spider toxins and their selective use in neurosecretion studies

期刊

TOXICON
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 527-542

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.02.008

关键词

latrotoxin; spider venom; latrophilin; neurexin; pore formation

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [B14085] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [074359] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The black widow spider venom contains several large protein toxins-latrotoxins-that are selectively targeted against different classes of animals: vertebrates, insects, and crustaceans. These toxins are synthesised as large precursors that undergo proteolytic processing and activation in the lumen of the venom gland. The mature latrotoxins demonstrate strong functional structure conservation and contain multiple ankyrin repeats, which mediate toxin oligomerisation. The three-dimensional structure has been determined for a-latrotoxin (alphaLTX), a representative venom component toxic to vertebrates. This reconstruction explains the mechanism of (alphaLTX pore formation by showing that it forms tetrameric complexes, harbouring a central channel, and that it is able to insert into lipid membranes. All latrotoxins cause massive release of neurotransmitters from nerve terminals of respective animals after binding to specific neuronal receptors. A G protein-coupled receptor latrophilin and a single-transmembrane receptor neurexin have been identified as major high-affinity receptors for alphaLTX. Latrotoxins act by several Ca2+-dependent and -independent mechanisms based oil pore formation and activation of receptors. Mutant recombinant alphaLTX that does not form pores has been used to dissect the Multiple actions of this toxin. As a result, important insights have been gained into the receptor signalling and the role of intracellular Ca2+ stores in the effect of alphaLTX. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据