4.3 Review

The role of genetic polymorphisms in metabolism of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines

期刊

CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 169-180

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389200043489036

关键词

heterocyclic aromatic amines; xenobiotic metabolism enzymes; polymorphisms; cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More than twenty heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) have been identified in grilled meats, Fish, poultry, and tobacco smoke condensate. HAAS are carcinogens and induce tumors at Multiple Sites in experimental laboratory animals. Because of the widespread occurrence of HAAs in foods, these chemicals may contribute to the etiology of several common human cancers that are associated with frequent consumption of grilled meals including colon, rectum, prostate, and breast. HAAs require metabolism in order to exert their genotoxic effects. Metabolic activation occurs by N-hydroxylation, a reaction catalyzed by cytochromes P450 (CYP). Sonic N-hydroxy-HAA metabolites may directly react with DNA. but further metabolism by N-acetyltransferases (NATs) or sulfotransferases (SULTs) may occur to form highly reactive N-acetoxy or N-sulfonyloxy esters that readily react with DNA bases. The N-acetoxy ester of the HAA 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhlP) is detoxified by glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), which catalyze the reduction of the reactive intermediate back to the parent amine. Sonic HAAs also undergo detoxification through conjugation reactions with the phase II enzymes Such as UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) or SULTs to form stable, polar products that are readily eliminated. All of these xenobiotic metabolism enzyme systems (XMEs) display common genetic polymorphisms, which may affect protein expression, protein stability, catalytic activity, and thus, the biological potency of these procarcinogens. In this review, the roles of common genetic polymorphisms of XMEs involved in HAA metabolism and cancer risk are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据