4.3 Article

A time course analysis of the changes in neuropeptide Y immunoreactivity in the rat cuneate nucleus following median nerve transection

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 369-377

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2003.12.003

关键词

calcitonin gene-related peptide; galanin; median nerve transection injury; neuropeptide Y; substance P; vasoactive intestinal peptide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using median nerve injury and immunocytochemical methods, we examined the temporal changes in neuropeptide Y (NPY) expression in the cuneate nucleus (CN) in rats following median nerve transection. Under normal circumstances, neuropeptide Y-immunoreactive (NPY-IR) fibers was not detectable in the CN. A few NPY-IR fibers were observed in the ipsilateral CN 5 days after the median nerve transection, and peaked at 4 weeks. Thereafter, they were gradually returned to nearly control level after 16 weeks. Quantitative evaluation showed that the mean percentage of area occupied by NPY-IR fibers in entire and three subregions of the CN at 4 weeks were significantly higher than that at other post-operated time points, respectively. The present ultrastructural observations in the middle region of CN showed that the significantly increased NPY immunoreactivity was confined only in the myelinated axons and terminals but not detected in the dendrites, somata, and glial cells. The NPY-IR terminals made axodendritic synaptic contacts with unlabeled elements. The present results indicate that the time course of the increase of NPY immunoreactivity is similar to c-Fos expression as described in a previous study [J. Neurotrauma 19 (2002) 897]. It is speculated that the increased NPY in the CN after axotomy may affect the excitability of postsynaptic cuneate neurons, however, the functional interaction between NPY and c-Fos-IR neurons needs to be further studied. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and The Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据