4.2 Article

Apparent absolute oral bioavailability in excess of 100% for a vitronectin receptor antagonist (SB-265123) in rat. II. Studies implicating transporter-mediated intestinal secretion

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 367-377

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0049825042000205540

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Transporters have been increasingly identified as a factor in limiting the oral bioavailability of certain drugs. Previously, the present authors investigated a compound (SB-265123) with an apparent absolute oral bioavailability (F-app ) consistently >100%, and excluded likely artefactual causes for this observation, as well as standard considerations of non-stationary or non-linear pharmacokinetics. The data led the authors to believe that SB-265123 might be a transporter substrate in the rat, and it was hypothesized that transporter interactions might be responsible for the observed F-app >100%. 2. In the present study, a model was proposed incorporating rapid and complete absorption and elimination by a saturable intestinal secretory pathway. Intestinal secretion was demonstrated for SB-265123 using a rat single-pass intestinal perfusion technique. In addition, in a study employing both independent and simultaneous intravenous and oral administration of SB-265123, exposure to SB-265123 was greater than additive on joint intravenous and oral administration, lending further support to the hypothesis of a saturable transporter. Furthermore, in a study with co-administration of GF120918A, a transporter inhibitor, the observed F-app for SB-265123 was only 84 +/- 17%, providing additional evidence for transporter involvement in the >100% F-app phenomenon. 3. Experience with SB-265123 illustrates a counterintuitive impact of transporters on oral bioavailability and highlights the importance of considering transporter interactions in the systemic disposition of xenobiotics, even those not demonstrating low oral bioavailability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据