4.6 Article

Modelling the mechanical properties of single suspension-cultured tomato cells

期刊

ANNALS OF BOTANY
卷 93, 期 4, 页码 443-453

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch062

关键词

tomato; cell wall; micromanipulation; Young's modulus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims The relationship between composition and structure of plant primary cell walls, and cell mechanical properties is not fully understood, partly because intrinsic properties of walls such as Young's modulus cannot be obtained readily. The aim of this work is to show that Young's modulus of walls of single suspension-cultured tomato cells can be determined by modelling force-deformation data. Methods The model simulates the compression of a cell between two flat surfaces, with the cell treated as a liquid-filled sphere with thin compressible walls. The cell wall and membrane were taken to be permeable, but the compression was so fast that water loss could be neglected in the simulations. Force-deformation data were obtained by compressing the cells in micromanipulation experiments. Key Results Good fits were obtained between the model and low-strain experimental data, using the modulus and initial inflation of the cell as adjustable parameters. The mean Young's modulus for 2-week-old cells was found to be 2.3 +/- 0.2 GPa at pH 5. This corresponds to an instantaneous bulk modulus of elasticity of approx. 7 MPa, similar to a value found by the pressure probe method. However, Young's modulus is a better parameter, as it should depend only on the composition and structure of the cell wall, not on bulk cell behaviour. This new method has been used to show that Young's modulus of cultured tomato cell walls is at its lowest at pH 4.5, the pH optimum for expansin activity. Conclusions The linear elastic model is very suitable for estimating wall Young's modulus from micromanipulation experiments on single tomato cells. This is a powerful method for determining cell wall material properties. (C) 2004 Annals of Botany Company.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据