4.5 Article

Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission in the Netherlands:: the value of search and destroy and restrictive antibiotic use

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 56, 期 4, 页码 321-325

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.01.026

关键词

Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin; resistance; prevalence; admission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Netherlands, less than 1% of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus are methicillin-resistant (MRSA). A national search and destroy policy prevents MRSA from becoming endemic. Some MRSA outbreaks cannot be related to patients at risk for MRSA carriage. This study was designed to measure the prevalence of MRSA among patients without risk factors for MRSA carriage at the time of admission to the hospital. In four Dutch hospitals, patients admitted to non-surgical departments in the period 1999 - 2000 were screened for MRSA nasal carriage. Nasal swabs were streaked on 5% sheep blood agar (BA), submerged in a selective broth, and incubated for two to three days at 35 degreesC. Colonies suspected of being S. aureus were identified with an agglutination test. Susceptibility testing was performed by an automated system and additional oxacillin disk diffusion. Methicillin resistance was confirmed by a DNA hybridization test and mecA PCR. MRSA strains were genotyped by pulsed-field get electrophoresis (PFGE). Twenty-four percent (2332/9859) of the patients were S. aureus nasal carriers. Only three (0.03%) patients were MRSA carriers. These patients were not repatriated, nor known to be MRSA carriers before screening. Genotyping revealed that the strains were not clonally related and were not related to MRSA outbreaks in the hospital where the patients were admitted. We conclude that at routine admission to a Dutch hospital (excluding high-risk foreign admissions) the MRSA prevalence is low (0.03%), due to the Dutch search and destroy policy and restrictive antibiotic prescribing. (C) 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据