4.6 Article

Identification of candidate genes involved in the reversal of malignant phenotype of osteosarcoma cells transfected with the liver/bone/kidney alkaline phosphatase gene

期刊

BONE
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 672-679

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.008

关键词

osteosarcoma; alkaline phosphatase; cDNA microarrays; caveolin 1; cadherin 13

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alkaline phosphatases (ALPs) are a family of cell surface glycoproteins that catalyze the hydrolysis of phosphomonoesters with release of inorganic phosphate. Liver/bone/kidney (L/B/K) ALP participates in bone mineralization, but its other physiological and pathological functions remain obscure. In human osteosarcoma, an inverse relationship has been found between cellular L/B/K ALP expression and aggressiveness. To explore this relationship, we employed cDNA microarray technology to characterize and compare the gene expression profile of two U-2 OS osteosarcoma clones with high L/B/K ALP activity (U-2/ALP28 and U-2/ALP40) and one with contrasting characteristics (U-2/ALP23). We identified 79 differentially expressed genes (58 upregulated in U-2/ALP28 and U-2/ALP40 compared to U-2/ALP23). Using GenMAPP/MAPPFinder, we highlighted nine functional groups strictly related to high L/B/K ALP activity, including microtubule-based movement and cell adhesion groups, two functions well related to tumor invasiveness. Notably, cadherin 13 (CDH13) and caveolin 1 (CAV1) genes were upregulated in our cells. Since these two genes are involved in cell-cell adhesion and cell growth, their coexpression with L/B/K ALP could help explain the lower levels of malignancy found in osteosarcoma cells with high L/B/K ALP activity. Although functional studies are needed to better define the role of CDH13 and CAV1 in the malignant behavior of osteosarcoma cells, the data presented here provide an aid to understanding the biological functions of L/B/K ALP in bone tumors. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据