4.6 Article

Effect of inorganic anions on the morphology and structure of magnesium calcite

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 1647-1656

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200305313

关键词

anions; calcite; crystal growth; crystal morphology; magnesium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium carbonate was precipitated from calcium hydroxide and carbonic acid solutions at 25degreesC, with and without addition of different magnesium (MgSO4, Mg(NO3)(2) and MgCl2) and sodium salts (Na2SO4, NaNO3 and NaCl) of identical anions, in order to study the mode of incorporation of magnesium and inorganic anions and their effect on the morphology of calcite crystals over a range of initial reactant concentrations and limited C-i(Mg2+)/c(i)(Ca2+) molar ratios. The morphology, crystal size distribution, composition, structure, and specific surface area of the precipitated crystals, as well as the mode of cation and anion incorporation into the calcite crystal lattice, were studied by a combination of optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electronic counting, a multiple BET method, thermogravimetry, FT-IR spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. In the systems of high initial relative supersaturation, precipitation of an amorphous precursor phase preceded the formation of calcite, whereas in those of lower supersaturation calcite was the first and only polymorphic modification of calcium carbonate that appeared in the system. ne magnesium content in calcite increased with the magnesium concentration in solution and was correlated with the type of magnesium salt used. Mg incorporation caused the formation of crystals elongated along the calcite c axis and, in some cases, the appearance of new {011} faces. Polycrystalline aggregates were formed when the c(i)(Mg2+)/ c(i)(Ca2+) molar ratios in solution were increased. Addition of sulfate ions, alone, caused formation of spherical calcite polycrystalline aggregates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据