4.1 Article

MATCHING PAST AND PRESENT CERAMIC PRODUCTION IN THE BANDA AREA (GHANA): IMPROVING THE ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE OF NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY USING MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

期刊

ARCHAEOMETRY
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 101-113

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00601.x

关键词

BANDA AREA (GHANA); NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS; CERAMICS; CHEMOMETRICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA); SOFT INDEPENDENT MODELLING OF CLASS ANALOGY (SIMCA); MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS

资金

  1. Spanish Government-Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  2. Autonomous Government of La Rioja (Consejeria de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte) [CTQ2008-03493/BQU, FOMENTA 2007/06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transfer of advances in chemometrics into archaeometric research opens up a wide range of new application possibilities in this rapidly developing field. Neutron activation analysis (NAA) of ceramic samples from the Banda Traditional Area (west-central Ghana) combined with chemometrics allowed us to establish a link between current and ancient systems of ceramics production in the historic settlements of Kuulo Kataa and Makala Kataa. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the soft independent modelling of class analogy (SIMCA) method were applied to the Das Dores Cruz data set in order to unequivocally determine the geographical origin of the diverse archaeological samples. After global autoscaling pretreatment, PCA analysis showed a clear difference between samples from different locations. The classification models obtained by SIMCA showed a classification ability of 100% and a prediction ability of 97.7%, with a mean sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 100% for the three categories. The application of SIMCA showed that some NAA variables (elements) were more important than others in terms of geographical classification. With the class models that we obtained, we were able to determine the origin of the ancient remains. SIMCA has proved to be a powerful technique for the class modelling of archaeological data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据