4.7 Article

Clinical significance of early thrombosis after prosthetic mitral valve replacement -: A postoperative monocentric study of 680 patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 1283-1290

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.064

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of early thrombosis, its prognostic significance, and the therapeutic implications. BACKGROUND ransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the method of choice for detecting symptomless early postoperative thrombosis of prosthetic valves. However, the clinical significance is not yet known. METHODS Between June 1994 and December 2000, 680 consecutive patients under-went TEE on day 9 after mechanical mitral valve replacement, to search for early thrombosis. Initially, end points were the in-hospital outcome and treatment. Patients were also evaluated 34 +/- 22 months after surgery. RESULTS Sixty-four early thrombi were detected (9.4%). Two early obstructive were treated by redo-surgery. Sixty-two nonobstructive benefited from medical treatment. The patients were allocated into two groups as a function of the maximum size of thrombus: <5 mm in 29 patients (group A) and greater than or equal to5 mm in 35 (group B). During early follow-up, we observed one complicated course in group A and eight in group B. In the long-term survey, three complications were noted in group A and 11 in group B. Incidence of early (p = 0.027) and long-term (p = 0.04) complications were significantly different in the two subsets. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the incidence of early thrombi after mechanical mitral valve replacement detected by TEE. A small (<5 mm) nonobstructive thrombus seems benign, and our experience argues in favor of medical treatment. Prognosis appears more serious for large thrombi. Medically aggressive therapy and further surgery should be considered in cases of obstructive thrombosis or large and mobile nonobstructive thrombosis. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据