4.6 Article

The clinical learning environment in nursing education: a concept analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 501-513

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12861

关键词

clinical environment; clinical learning environment; concept analysis; nursing; nursing education

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimThe aim of this study was to report an analysis of the clinical learning environment concept. BackgroundNursing students are evaluated in clinical learning environments where skills and knowledge are applied to patient care. These environments affect achievement of learning outcomes, and have an impact on preparation for practice and student satisfaction with the nursing profession. Providing clarity of this concept for nursing education will assist in identifying antecedents, attributes and consequences affecting student transition to practice. DesignThe clinical learning environment was investigated using Walker and Avant's concept analysis method. Data sourcesA literature search was conducted using WorldCat, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases using the keywords clinical learning environment, clinical environment and clinical education. Articles reviewed were written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals between 1995-2014. MethodsAll data were analysed for recurring themes and terms to determine possible antecedents, attributes and consequences of this concept. ResultsThe clinical learning environment contains four attribute characteristics affecting student learning experiences. These include: (1) the physical space; (2) psychosocial and interaction factors; (3) the organizational culture and (4) teaching and learning components. These attributes often determine achievement of learning outcomes and student self-confidence. ConclusionWith better understanding of attributes comprising the clinical learning environment, nursing education programmes and healthcare agencies can collaborate to create meaningful clinical experiences and enhance student preparation for the professional nurse role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据