4.7 Article

Cd1d is expressed on B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and mediates α-galactosylceramide presentation to natural killer T lymphocytes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 109, 期 3, 页码 402-411

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11723

关键词

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia; natural killer T cells; alpha-galactosylceramide; CDId

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generation of immune responses against B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) has been the aim of several studies that have demonstrated a poor antigen presenting ability of B-CLL cells and an inconsistent emergence of T cells capable of killing efficiently the leukemic cells. CD1d is a restriction element structurally related to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and capable of presenting lipid antigens to CD1d-restricted T cells (also defined as natural killer-T [NKT] cells). The synthetic lipid a-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer) has been characterized as a potent stimulator of CD1d-restricted T cells. We have investigated the expression of CD1d on B-CLL cells. CD1d was detected by flow cytometric analyses on leukemic cells of all B-CLL cases studied (n = 38) and was expressed at higher density on cells carrying unmutated immunoglobulin variable region (IgV) genes. In addition, CD1d on B-CLL cells mediated the presentation of alpha-GalCer to CD1d-restricted T cells, which in turn induced B-CLL cell death. At variance with another study (Metelitsa et al., Leukemia 2003;17:1068-77), no correlation between expression levels of CD1d and susceptibility to NKT cell lysis was observed. Proliferation and production of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) by CD1d-restricted T cells, in the presence of B-CLL cells loaded with alpha-GalCer, were also observed. Our study demonstrates that B-CLL cells express a monomorphic restriction element that is functionally capable of antigen presentation and can be useful to design novel B-CLL immunotherapies. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据