4.7 Article

Reclinical evaluation of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent celecoxib on malignant mesothelioma chemoprevention

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 109, 期 3, 页码 322-328

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11710

关键词

mesothelioma; NSAIDs; celecoxib; chemoprevention

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) remains the most lethal pleural, peritoneal and pericardial cancer. Here, we characterize the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) on in vitro and in vivo experimental MM models. Unlike primary normal mesothelial cells, the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor celecoxib reduced the in vitro proliferation of several MM cells derived from previously untreated MM patients. Moreover, celecoxib significantly inhibited MM cell colony formation in soft agarose (63-78% at 5 X 10(-5) M; p less than or equal to 0.05) and it elicited remarkable antitumor activity, leading to long-term survival in >37% of nude mice bearing intraperitoneal MM. Celecoxib was more efficient in inhibiting MM cell growth than acetylsalicylic acid (10(-6) M-10(-2) M), indometacin (10(-6) M-10(-2) M) and the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 (10(-6) M-10(-4) M) Efficacy of these different compounds was not related to the amount of COX-2 protein levels present on MM cells. Celecoxib, in a dose- and time-dependent manner, induced MM cell apoptosis, which involved decreased Akt phosphorylation, loss of Bcl-2 and Survivin protein expression and caspase-3 activation. Furthermore, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an MM autocrine growth factor and Akt inducer, rescued celecoxib-induced apoptosis and Akt dephosphorylation. When the VEGF receptor (KDR/Flk-1) inhibitor, SU-1498, was used in combination with celecoxib, IC50 of celecoxib in vitro was reduced up to 65%. These data demonstrate that celecoxib may have antitumor properties in MM and provide a rationale for the therapeutic use of celecoxib in combination with a selective VEGF inhibitor. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据