4.6 Article

Synthesis of poly(methyl methaerylate) nanocomposites via emulsion polymerization using a zwitterionic surfactant

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 3424-3430

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la0357099

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of nanocomposites via emulsion polymerization was investigated using methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer, 10 wt % montmorillonite (MMT) clay, and a zwitterionic surfactant octadecyl dimethyl betaine (C18DMB). The particle size of the diluted polymer emulsion was about 550 nm, as determined by light scattering, while the sample without clay had a diameter of about 350 nm. The increase in the droplet size suggests that clay was present in the emulsion droplets. X-ray diffraction indicated no peak in the nanocomposites. Transmission electron microscopy showed that emulsion polymerization of MMA in the presence of C18DMB and MMT formed partially exfoliated nanocomposites. Differential scanning calorimetry showed an increase of 18 degreesC in the glass transition temperature (T-g) of the nanocomposites. A dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer also verified a similar T-g increase, 16 degreesC, for the partially exfoliated nanocomposites over poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Thermogravimetric analysis indicated a 37 degreesC increase in the decomposition temperature for a 20 wt % loss. A PMMA nanocomposite with 10 wt % C18DMB-MMT was also synthesized via in situ polymerization. This nanocomposite was intercalated and had a T-g 10degrees lower than the emulsion nanocomposite. The storage modulus of the partially exfoliated emulsion nanocomposite was superior to the intercalated structure at higher temperatures and to the pure polymer. The rubbery plateau modulus was over 30 times higher for the emulsion product versus pure PMMA. The emulsion technique produced nanocomposites of the highest molecular weight with a bimodal distribution. This reinstates that exfoliated structures have enhanced thermal and mechanical properties over intercalated hybrids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据