4.7 Article

Decreased expression of 14-3-3σ is associated with advanced disease in human epithelial ovarian cancer:: Its correlation with aberrant DNA methylation

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 2687-2693

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0510

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: In this study, we examined the promoter methylation status and expression of 14-3-3sigma and evaluated its clinical significance in epithelial ovarian cancer. Experimental Design: Twelve ovarian cancer cell lines; 2 ovarian surface epithelial cell lines; and 8 normal, 8 benign, 12 borderline, and 102 ovarian cancer tissues were examined. Methylation-specific PCR, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and immunohistochemistry were used to evaluate methylation status and expression of 14-3-3sigma gene and protein. Results: Among the 12 ovarian cancer cell lines, the presence of a methylated band was detected in seven cell lines. Median values of relative 14-3-3sigma gene expression in cancers with methylation (3.27) were significantly lower than those without methylation (16.4; P < 0.001). Treatment of 5-aza-2'-deoxycitidine resulted in the demethylation of the promoter CpG islands and reexpression. All of the normal, benign, and borderline tissues were positive for 14-3-3 sigma protein, and in ovarian cancer tissues, 73.5% (75 of 102) were positive for 14-3-3 sigma protein and was almost consistent with methylation status. Negative immunoreactivity of 14-3-3 sigma was significantly correlated with high age and serous histology, high-grade, advanced-stage residual tumor of >2 cm, high serum CA125, high Ki-67 labeling index, and positive p53 immunoreactivity. 14-3-3sigma immunoreactivity was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.0058). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that 14-3-3sigma is inactivated mainly by aberrant DNA methylation and that it may play an important role in the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据