4.6 Article

Kinetics of Mg2+ unblock of NMDA receptors:: implications for spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 556, 期 2, 页码 337-345

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058842

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The time course of Mg2+ block and unblock of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) determines the extent they are activated by depolarization. Here, we directly measure the rate of NMDAR channel opening in response to depolarizations at different times after brief (1 ms) and sustained (4.6 s) applications of glutamate to nucleated patches from neocortical pyramidal neurons. The kinetics of Mg2+ unblock were found to be non-instantaneous and complex, consisting of a prominent fast component (time constant similar to100 mus) and slower components (time constants 4 and 300 ms), the relative amplitudes of which depended on the timing of the depolarizing pulse. Fitting a kinetic model to these data indicated that Mg2+ not only blocks the NMDAR channel, but reduces both the open probability and affinity for glutamate, while enhancing desensitization. These effects slow the rate of NMDAR channel opening in response to depolarization in a time-dependent manner such that the slower components of Mg2+ unblock are enhanced during depolarizations at later times after glutamate application. One physiological consequence of this is that brief depolarizations occurring earlier in time after glutamate application are better able to open NMDAR channels. This finding has important implications for spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP), where the precise (millisecond) timing of action potentials relative to synaptic inputs determines the magnitude and sign of changes in synaptic strength. Indeed, we find that STDP timing curves of NMDAR channel activation elicited by realistic dendritic action potential waveforms are narrower than expected assuming instantaneous Mg2+ unblock, indicating that Slow Mg2+ unblock of NMDAR channels makes the STDP timing window more precise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据