4.2 Article

Crack propagation patterns and energy evolution rules of coal within slotting disturbed zone under various lateral pressure coefficients

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 6643-6654

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-014-1728-9

关键词

Hydraulic slotting; Micro-crack; Lateral pressure coefficient; Energy evolution

资金

  1. State Key Basic Research Program of China [2011CB201205]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51204174]
  3. National Science and Technology Support Program [2012BAK04B07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lateral pressure coefficient is an important parameter in geological engineering, and it influences significantly the damage zone around boreholes. In accordance with the fundamental principles of the Particle Flow Code (PFC), various models were established to investigate the crack propagation patterns and energy evolution rules of coal in disturbed zones of hydraulic slotting for various lateral pressure coefficients. Cracks around a slotted borehole propagate in the horizontal direction when the lateral pressure coefficient lambda is less than 1, distribute uniformly when lambda is equal to 1, and extend mostly in the vertical direction when lambda is greater than 1. The total number of cracks increases linearly with lambda. The variation in kinetic energy for coal failure was recorded; kinetic energy evolution observes a similar rule and its process can be divided into four stages, namely, the quick-release, rapid dissipation, drastic fluctuation, and stabilized stages. The peak value of the kinetic energy increases linearly with lambda. The acoustic emission events distribute discretely when lambda is small and uniformly when lambda is equal to 1. The variation in acoustic emission events tends to increase sharply before decreasing when lambda is greater than 1. The research findings are significant to the exploration of pressure relief mechanisms for hydraulic slotting from a microcosmic perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据