4.5 Article

A novel exon 5 mutation (N139H) in the SOD1 gene in a Spanish family associated with incomplete penetrance

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 219, 期 1-2, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.10.018

关键词

familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALS1; SOD1 gene; N139H mutation; penetrance; MIM 105400

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Allelic heterogeneity and phenotype variability-especially in age at onset, penetrance and progression-are reported in ALS1 families. For this reason, SOD1 gene mutation data in ALS1 patients are currently being gathered to better understand the genotype-phenotype relationship in this disorder. Here, we report the clinical and molecular characteristics of a Spanish ALS1 family with incomplete penetrance. Patients and methods: Clinical data including age at onset, initial topography, progression and survival were available in three affected members. Erythrocyte SOD1 activity was measured in four individuals. Analysis of the SOD1 gene was performed by PCR and direct sequencing. Results: A novel missense mutation in the exon 5 of the SOD1 gene, an A-to-C transversion at nucleotide position 1485 leading to N139H residue change, was identified in three family members. The phenotype was similar in all cases, with initial symptoms in the distal limb muscles and a mean survival time of around 4 years. Incomplete penetrance was observed in our family, as two obligate carriers did not develop any symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Conclusions: N139H is the fifth SOD1 gene mutation reported in Spain, and the first one presenting with incomplete penetrance. Genetic counseling for at-risk relatives in these low-penetrance families could be difficult as some individuals harbouring the mutation remain asymptomatic, throughout their lives. Further genetic characterisation of ALS1 families should provide information regarding the distribution of SOD1 mutants in different ethnic groups. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据