4.2 Article

Phenotypic manifestations of MECP2 mutations in classical and atypical Rett syndrome

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 126A, 期 2, 页码 129-140

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20571

关键词

methyl binding protein; X-linked mental retardation; Rett syndrome; epigenetic

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 00032] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD 37874] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the identification of mutations in MECP2 in girls and women with apparent Rett syndrome, numerous efforts have been made to develop phenotype-genotype correlations. These studies have produced conflicting results in part related to use of different clinical severity scales, different diagnostic criteria, and different stratification by age and mutation group as well as the possible effects of unbalanced X-chromosome inactivation. The present study applied a revised ordinal scoring system that allowed for correction for patient ages. We analyzed 85 patients with mutation in MECP2. Sixty-five (76%) had one of eight common mutations. Patients with missense mutations had lower total severity scores and better language performance than those with nonsense mutations. No difference was noted between severity scores for mutations in the methyl-binding domain (MED) and the transcriptional repression domain (TRD). However, patients with missense mutations in TRD had the best overall scores and better preservation of head growth and language skills. Analysis of specific mutation groups demonstrated a striking difference for patients with the R306C mutation including better overall score, later regression, and better language with less motoric impairment. Indeed, these patients as a group accounted for the differences in overall scores between the missense and nonsense groups. Thus, the impact of specific mutations coupled with possible variation in X-chromosome inactivation must be considered carefully in the derivation of phenotype-genotype correlations. These results emphasize the limitations of such analyses in larger mutation groups, either by type or position. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据