4.8 Article

Immediate early response gene X-1, a stress-inducible antiapoptotic gene, encodes cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes capable of inducing human leukocyte antigen-A33-restricted and tumor-reactive CTLs in gastric cancer patients

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 64, 期 8, 页码 2882-2888

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3549

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptide-based vaccine therapy, which is designed to elicit T-cell immunity against tumors, is an attractive approach for the treatment of cancer patients. To provide a scientific basis for peptide therapy, an increasing number of CTL-directed peptides have been identified, and some of them have been tried as antigen-specific immunotherapy in the past decade. Only a few studies, however, have been performed on such peptides restricted with alleles other than HLA-A2 and -A24. In the present study, we show that immediate early response gene X-1 (IEX-1), a stress-inducible protein associated with the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis, produces antigenic epitopes recognized by 850B-CTLs, HLA-A33-restricted CTLs newly established from T cells infiltrating into gastric adenocarcinoma. The IEX-1 gene was highly expressed in most cell lines and tissues from various types of cancer at both the mRNA and protein levels. However, it was not expressed at the protein level in any normal epithelium or connective tissues tested. Three IEX-1-derived peptides at positions 47-56, 61-69, and 65-73, which were recognized by the 850B-CTLs, could induce CD8(+) peptide-specific CTL reaction to tumor cells from HLA-A33(+) gastric cancer patients and other epithelial cancer patients, but not from healthy donors, in an HLA class I-restricted manner. Because increased expression of IEX-1 is suggested to be involved in the resistance to apoptosis and in the proliferation of cancer cells, these antigenic peptides could be potent candidates for peptide-based specific immunotherapy against HLA-A33(+) gastric cancer and other epithelial cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据