4.7 Article

First-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams of elongated single-domain grains at high and low temperatures -: art. no. B04105

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JB002539

关键词

FORC diagram; single-domain grains; high-temperature magnetism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] First-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams are a new technique for identifying magnetic minerals and characterizing their domain structures and interactions. FORC diagrams have potentially important applications for determining magnetic mineral compositions and grain sizes in paleomagnetism and environmental magnetism. However, the interpretation of the FORC parameters H-c and H-u as being equivalent to microcoercivity and particle interaction field, respectively, needs to be thoroughly tested in order to validate the FORC method. In order to test this interpretation, we measured FORC diagrams on elongated single-domain particles at temperatures ranging from 20 to 853 K (580 degreesC). The FORC distribution contracts significantly along both axes above 430 degreesC, and the bulk coercive force decreases rapidly. The main causes of these features are decreasing spontaneous magnetization M-s(T) and increasing thermal activation of single-domain moments pinned by shape anisotropy. A profile through the FORC peak along the H-c axis can be integrated to give a synthetic alternating field demagnetization curve or isothermal remanence curve. The synthesized curves match measured curves quite well at a variety of temperatures, and the FORC median Hc varies approximately in proportion to the bulk coercive force. A profile through the FORC peak parallel to the H-u axis contracts with heating approximately as M-s(T), and the half width of the distribution is similar to independent measures of local interaction fields H-i. These properties support the interpretation of the FORC variables H-c and H-u as being equivalent to microcoercivity H-c and interaction field H-i, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据