4.7 Article

Metabolic syndrome amplifies the age-associated increases in vascular thickness and stiffness

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 8, 页码 1388-1395

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.061

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We sought to evaluate whether the clustering of multiple components of the metabolic syndrome (MS) has a greater impact on these vascular parameters than individual components of MS. BACKGROUND Intima-media thickness (IMT) and vascular stiffness have been shown to be independent predictors of adverse cardiovascular events. The MS is defined as the clustering of three or more of the cardiovascular risk factors of dysglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity. METHODS Carotid IMT and stifness were derived via B-mode ultrasonography in 471 participants from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging, who were without clinical cardiovascular disease and not receiving antihypertensive therapy. RESULTS The MS conferred a disproportionate increase in carotid IMT (+16%, p < 0.0001) and stiffness (+32%, p < 0.0001), compared with control subjects. Multiple regression models, which included age, gender, smoking, low-density lipoprotein, as well as each individual component of MS as continuous variables, showed that MS was an independent determinant of both IMT (p = 0.002) and stiffness (p = 0.012). The MS was associated with a greater prevalence of subjects whose values were in the highest quartiles of IMT, stiffness, or both. CONCLUSIONS Even after taking into account each individual component of MS, the clustering of at least three of these components is independently associated with increased IMT and stifness. This suggests that the components of MS interact to synergistically impact vascular thickness and stifness. Future studies should examine whether the excess cardiovascular risk associated with MS is partly mediated through the amplified alterations in these vascular properties. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据