4.5 Review

Recycled metasomatized lithosphere as the origin of the enriched mantle II (EM2) end-member: Evidence from the Samoan volcanic chain

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003GC000623

关键词

EM2; Samoa; metasomatized lithosphere; Sr-Nd-Pb-He-Os isotopes; hot spot chain; Vailulu'u Volcano; geochemistry : isotopic composition/chemistry; tectonophysics : dynamics, convection currents and mantle plumes; planetology : solid surface planets : volcanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] An in-depth Sr-Nd-Pb-He-Os isotope and trace element study of the EMII-defining Samoan hot spot lavas leads to a new working hypothesis for the origin of this high Sr-87/Sr-86 mantle end-member. Systematics of the Samoan fingerprint include (1) increasing Pb-206/Pb-204 with time - from 18.6 at the older, western volcanoes to 19.4 at the present-day hot spot center, Vailulu'u Seamount, (2) en-echelon arrays in Pb-206/Pb-204-Pb-208/Pb-204 space which correspond to the two topographic lineaments of the 375 km long volcanic chain - this is much like the Kea and Loa Trends in Hawai'i, (3) the highest Sr-87/Sr-86 (0.7089) of all oceanic basalts, (4) an asymptotic decrease in He-3/He-4 from 24 R-A [Farley et al., 1992] to the MORB value of 8 R-A with increasing Sr-87/Sr-86, and (5) mixing among four components which are best described as the enriched mantle'', the depleted FOZO mantle, the (even more depleted) MORB Mantle, and a mild HIMU (high U-238/Pb-204) mantle component. A theoretical, pure'' EMII lava composition has been calculated and indicates an extremely smooth trace element pattern of this end-member mantle reservoir. The standard recycling model (of ocean crust/sediment) fails as an explanation for producing Samoan EM2, due to these smooth spidergrams for EM2 lavas, low Os-187/Os-188 ratios and high He-3/He-4 (>8 R-A). Instead, the origin of EM2 has been modeled with the ancient formation of metasomatised oceanic lithosphere, followed by storage in the deep mantle and return to the surface in the Samoan plume.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据