4.7 Article

Variations in nucleus accumbens dopamine associated with individual differences in maternal behavior in the rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 24, 期 17, 页码 4113-4123

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5322-03.2004

关键词

maternal; behavior; dopamine; dopamine receptors; nucleus accumbens; voltammetry

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH060381, R01 MH060381] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactating rats exhibit stable individual differences in pup licking/grooming. We used in vivo voltammetry to monitor changes in extracellular dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens (n. Acc) shell of lactating rats interacting with pups and found that ( 1) the DA signal increased significantly with pup licking/grooming; ( 2) the onset of such increases preceded pup licking/grooming; and ( 3) the magnitude and duration of the increase in the DA signal were significantly correlated with the duration of the licking/grooming bout. In females characterized on the basis of behavioral observations as high-licking/grooming mothers, the magnitude of the increase in the DA signal associated with licking/grooming was significantly greater than in low-licking/grooming dams. Dopamine transporter binding in the n. Acc was increased in low-compared with high-licking/grooming mothers. Injection of the selective DA uptake inhibitor GBR 12909 [1-(2-(Bis-(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy)ethyl)-4-(3phenypropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride] (5 mg/kg, s.c.) increased the DA signal in the n. Acc and pup licking/grooming in low-licking/grooming mothers to levels comparable with those observed in high-licking/grooming dams. Receptor autoradiographic studies showed elevated levels of D-1 and D-3 receptors in the n. Acc shell region in high-licking/grooming dams. These results suggest that high- and low-licking/grooming dams differ in mesolimbic dopaminergic activity associated with mother-pup interactions. Such differences may serve as neural substrates for individual differences in the motivational component of maternal behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据