4.6 Article

Tumor necrosis factor-α induces fractalkine expression preferentially in arterial endothelial cells and mithramycin A suppresses TNF-α-induced fractalkine expression

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 164, 期 5, 页码 1663-1672

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63725-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fractalkine is an unusual tumor necrosis factor (TNF)a-induced chemokine. The molecule is tethered to cells that express it and produces strong and direct adhesion to leukocytes expressing fractalkine receptor. However, the potential mechanism and significance of TNF-alpha-induced fractalkine expression in vascular endothelial cells are poorly understood. Here we show that in primary cultured endothelial cells TNF-alpha-induced fractalkine mRNA expression is mediated mainly through phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase activation and nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB mediated transcriptional activation, along with GC DNA-binding protein-mediated transcription. Interestingly, GG rich DNA-binding protein inhibitors, mithramycin A and chromomycin A3, strongly suppressed TNF-alpha-induced fractalkine mRNA expression, possibly through inhibition of transcriptional activities by NF-kappaB and Sp1. In fact, direct inhibition of NF-kappaB and Sp1 bindings by decoy oligonucleotides suppressed TNF-a-induced fractalkine expression. Histologically, TNF-a-induced fractalkine expression was observed markedly in arterial and capillary endothelial cells, endocardium, and endothelium of intestinal villi, and slightly in venous endothelial cells, but not at all in lymphatic endothelial cells of intestine. Mithramycin A markedly suppressed TNF-a-induced fractalkine expression in vivo. These results indicate that TNF-alpha-stimulated fractalkine expression could act as part of arterial endothelial adhesion to leukocytes and monocytes; during inflammation and atherosclerosis. NF-kappaB and Sp1 inhibitors such as mithramycin A may provide a pharmacological approach to suppressing these processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据