4.5 Article

Nitric oxide inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression via the induction of activating transcription factor 3 in endothelial cells

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 65, 期 5, 页码 1130-1140

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.65.5.1130

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide ( NO) has been shown to inhibit migration of cells in which various matrix metalloproteinases ( MMPs) are involved. The underlying molecular mechanisms of this inhibition remain elusive. Endothelial cells (ECs) constitutively produce MMP-2. The effect of NO on MMP-2 expression was examined. A dose-dependent inhibition of MMP-2 mRNA level was demonstrated in ECs treated with NO. ECs infected with adenovirus carrying endothelial NO synthase ( Ad-eNOS) reduced MMP-2 expression. The inhibitory effect of NO on MMP-2 expression was a transcriptional event because NO reduced MMP-2 promoter activity. NO treatment of ECs consequently suppressed MMP-2 secretion revealed by zymographic assay. Functional analysis of MMP-2 promoter ( 1716 base pairs) indicated that the p53-binding site ( - 1659 to - 1629) was crucial for MMP-2 promoter activity. Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) has been reported to act as a transcriptional repressor for p53. ECs treated with NO induced ATF3 expression. Consistently, AdeNOS-infected ECs showed an increase of ATF3 level. Moreover, ECs either over-expressed ATF3 or, when treated with an ATF3 activator (MG-132; carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucinal), resulted in a repression of MMP-2 promoter activity. Because of MMP-2 suppression by NO, ECs treated with NO inhibited endothelial migration, a phenomenon similar to that of ECs treated with MMP-2 antibody or MG-132. These results indicate that NO-attenuating endothelial migration is mediated at least in part by its reduction of MMP-2 expression via the up-regulation of ATF3. This study provides a molecular basis that supports the notion that NO acts as a negative regulator in endothelial migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据