3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate

期刊

ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
卷 139, 期 5, 页码 540-545

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.540

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothesis: Aggressive screening, early angiographic diagnosis, and prompt anticoagulation for blunt carotid artery injuries (CAIs) improves neurologic outcome. Design: From January 1, 1996, through December 3 1, 2002, there were 13 280 blunt trauma admissions to our level I center, of which 643 under-went screening angiography for blunt CAI on the basis of a protocol including injury patterns and symptoms. Patients without con-traindications underwent anticoagulation immediately for documented lesions. Setting: A state-designated, level I urban trauma center Patients: Of the 643 patients undergoing screening angiography, 114 (18%) had confirmed CAI. Intervention: Early angiographic diagnosis and prompt anticoagulation. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnosis, stroke rate, and complications stratified by method of intervention. Results: A CAI was identified in 114 patients during the 7-year study period; the majority were men (71%), with a mean SD age of 34 +/- 1.3 years and a mean +/- SD Injury Severity Score of 29 +/-1.5. Seventy-three patients underwent anticoagulation after diagnosis (heparin in 54, low-molecular-weight heparin in 2, antiplatelet agents in 17); none had a stroke. Of the 41 patients who did not receive anticoagulation (because of a contraindication in 27, symptoms before diagnosis in 9, and carotid coil or stent in 5), 19 patients (46%) developed neurologic ischemia. Ischemic neurologic events occurred in 100% of patients who presented with symptoms before angio-graphic diagnosis and those receiving a carotid coil or stent without anticoagulation. Conclusions: Our prospective evaluation of blunt CAIs suggests that early diagnosis and prompt anticoagulation reduce ischemic neurologic events and their disability. The optimal anticoagulation regimen, however, remains to be established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据