4.4 Article

Development of a biotin mimic tagged ScFv antibody against western equine encephalitis virus: bacterial expression and refolding

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
卷 117, 期 2, 页码 169-177

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.01.008

关键词

WEE; ScFv; biotin mimic; refolding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single chain antibodies (ScFvs) are heavy and light chain variable domains connected by an artificial linker. Because of their smaller size, ScFvs show improved tissue penetration in vivo and reduced immunogenicity, making them ideal for therapeutic applications. We have cloned a ScFv against western equine encephalitis (WEE) using rDNA technology. The ScFv was generated from a hybridoma cell line (11D2) specific to the WEE virus El glycoprotein and is arranged in the V-L-V-H orientation with a (gly(4)ser)(3) linker. This ScFv was engineered successfully with a biotin mimic tag (11 amino acid peptide) and cloned in the pET22b+ expression vector. The ScFv was expressed as a similar to32 kDa protein in Escherichia coli as inclusion bodies, with an estimated yield of 20-40 mg/l. Different refolding protocols were used to solubilise the inclusion bodies. Most of the functional ScFv was generated when. the inclusion bodies were solubilized in a detergent, air oxidised in the presence Of CuSO4 and then denatured in urea buffer in comparison to other protocols. The product was renatured finally in Tris arginine buffer (pH 8.0). Refolded protein was dialysed against phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (pH 7.3) to remove the Tris and arginine. Our refolding protocol generated up to a 50% yield of soluble protein, which retained antigen-binding activity with whole inactivated WEE virus as demonstrated by ELISA and Western blot analysis. This 11D2-biotin mimic ScFv complexed with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (St-HRPO) will be useful as a detector reagent in the ultrasensitive ELISA detection of WEE virus antigen. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据