4.7 Article

The origin and mechanisms of salinization of the Lower Jordan River

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 68, 期 9, 页码 1989-2006

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2003.09.021

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chemical and isotopic (Sr-87/Sr-86, delta(11)B, delta(34)S(sulfate), delta(18)O(water), delta(15)N(nitrate)) compositions of water from the Lower Jordan River and its major tributaries between the Sea of Galilee and the Dead Sea were determined in order to reveal the origin of the salinity of the Jordan River. We identified three separate hydrological zones along the flow of the river: (1) A northern section (20 kin downstream of its source) where the base flow composed of diverted saline and wastewaters is modified due to discharge of shallow sulfate-rich groundwater, characterized by low Sr-87/Sr-86 (0.7072) delta(34)S(sulfate) (-2parts per thousand), high delta(11)B (similar to36parts per thousand), delta(15)N(nitrate) (similar to15parts per thousand) and high delta(18)O(water) (-2 to-3parts per thousand) values. The shallow groundwater is derived from agricultural drainage water mixed with natural saline groundwater and discharges to both the Jordan and Yarmouk rivers. The contribution of the groundwater component in the Jordan River flow, deduced from mixing relationships of solutes and strontium isotopes, varies from 20 to 50% of the total flow. (2) A central zone (20-50 km downstream from its source) where salt variations are minimal and the rise of Sr-87/Sr-86 and SO4/Cl ratios reflects predominance of eastern surface water flows. (3) A southern section (50-100 km downstream Of its Source) where the total dissolved solids of the Jordan River increase, particularly during the spring (70-80 km) and Summer (80-100 km) to values as high as 11.1 g/L. Variations in the chemical and isotopic compositions of river water along the southern section suggest chat the Zarqa River (Sr-87/(86)Srsimilar to0.70865; delta(11)Bsimilar to25parts per thousand) has a negligible affect on the Jordan River. Instead, the river quality is influenced primarily by groundwater discharge composed of sulfate-rich saline groundwater (Cl-=31-180 mM: SO4/Clsimilar to0.2-0.5; Br/Clsimilar to2-3x10(-3); Sr-87/(86)Srsimilar to0.70805; delta(11)Bsimilar to30parts per thousand; delta(15)N(nitrate) similar to17parts per thousand, delta(34)S(sulfate)=4-10parts per thousand), and Ca-chloride Rift valley brines (Cl-=846-1500 mM; Br/Clsimilar to6-8x10(-3); Sr-87/ (86)Srsimilar to0.7080; delta(11)B>40parts per thousand; delta(34)S(sulfate)=4-10parts per thousand). Mixing calculations indicate that the groundwater discharged to the river is composed of varying proportions of brines and sulfate-rich saline groundwater. Solute mass balance calculations point to a similar to10% contribution of saline groundwater (Cl-=282 to 564 mM) to the river. A high nitrate level (up to 2.5 mM) in the groundwater suggests that drainage of wastewater derived irrigation water is an important source for the groundwater. This irrigation water appears to leach Pleistocene sediments of the Jordan Valley resulting in elevated sulfate contents and altered strontium and boron isotopic compositions of the groundwater that in turn impacts the water quality of the lower Jordan River. Copyright (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据