4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Vibrational echo correlation spectroscopy probes of hydrogen bond dynamics in water and methanol

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 107, 期 1-4, 页码 271-286

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2003.12.035

关键词

infrared; ultrafast; vibrational echo; correlation spectroscopy; multidimensional; methanol; hydrogen bond network; hydrogen bond dynamics; hydrogen bond breaking; water

类别

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM061137-08, R01 GM061137] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidimensional vibrational echo correlation spectroscopy with full phase resolution is used to measure hydrogen bond dynamics in water and methanol. The OD hydroxyl stretches of methanol-OD oligomers in CCl4 and HOD in H2O are studied using the shortest mid-IR pulses (<50 fs, <4 cycles of light) produced to date. The pulses have sufficient spectral bandwidth to span the very broad (>400 cm(-1)) spectrum of the 0-1 and 1-2 transitions. Hydrogen bond population dynamics are extricated with exceptional detail in MeOD oligomers because the different hydrogen bonded species are spectrally distinct. The experimental results along with detailed calculations indicate the strongest hydrogen bonds are selectively broken through a non-equilibrium relaxation pathway following vibrational relaxation of the hydroxyl stretch. The correlation spectra are also a sensitive probe of the fluctuations in water and provide a stringent test of water models that are widely used in simulations of aqueous systems. The analysis of the 2D band shapes demonstrates that different hydrogen bonded species are subject to distinct (wavelength dependent) ultrafast (similar to100 fs) local fluctuations and essentially identical slow (0.4 and similar to2 ps) structural rearrangements. Observation of wavelength dependent dynamics demonstrates that standard theoretical approaches assuming Gaussian fluctuations cannot adequately describe water dynamics. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据