4.7 Article

Molecular effects of the cyanobacterial toxin cyanopeptolin (CPI 020) occurring in algal blooms: Global transcriptome analysis in zebrafish embryos

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 33-39

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.01.018

关键词

Cyanobacterial toxin; Cyanopeptolin; Transcriptomics; Modes of action; Molecular effects; Zebrafish

资金

  1. Functional Genomics Centre, ETH
  2. University of Zurich
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PDFMP3_132466]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PDFMP3_132466] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher water temperatures due to climate change combined with eutrophication of inland waters promote cyanobacterial blooms. Some of the cyanobacteria produce toxins leading to drinking water contamination and fish poisoning on a global scale. Here, we focused on the molecular effects of the cyanobacterial oligopeptide cyanopeptolin CPI 020, produced by Microcystis and Planktothrix strains, by means of whole-genome transcriptomics. Exposure of 72 hpf old zebrafish embryos for 96 h to 100 and 1000 pg/L CPI 020 resulted in differential transcriptional alteration of 396 and 490 transcripts (fold change >2), respectively, of which 68 gene transcripts were common. These belong to genes related to various important biological and physiological pathways. Most clearly affected were pathways related to DNA damage recognition and repair, circadian rhythm and response to light. Validation by RT-qPCR showed dose-dependent transcriptional alterations of genes belonging to DNA damage and repair and regulation of circadian rhythm. This leads to the hypothesis that CPI 020 acts on DNA and has neurotoxic activity. This transcriptome analysis leads to the identification of novel and unknown molecular effects of this cyanobacterial toxin, including neurotoxicity, which may have important consequences for humans consuming contaminated drinking water. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据