4.7 Article

The human erythrocyte proteome - Analysis by ion trap mass spectrometry

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 501-509

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M300132-MCP200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL070588] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report describes an analysis of the red blood cell proteome by ion trap tandem mass spectrometry in line with liquid chromatography. Mature red blood cells lack all internal cell structures and consist of cytoplasm within a plasma membrane envelope. To maximize outcome, total red blood cell protein was divided into two fractions of membrane-associated proteins and cytoplasmic proteins. Both fractions were divided into subfractions, and proteins were identified in each fraction separately through tryptic digestion. Membrane protein digests were collected from externally exposed proteins, internally exposed proteins, spectrin extract mainly consisting of membrane skeleton proteins, and membrane proteins minus spectrin extract. Cytoplasmic proteins were divided into 21 fractions based on molecular mass by size exclusion chromatography. The tryptic peptides were separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and identified by ion trap tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 181 unique protein sequences were identified: 91 in the membrane fractions and 91 in the cytoplasmic fractions. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was identified with high sequence coverage in both membrane and cytoplasmic fractions. Identified proteins include membrane skeletal proteins, metabolic enzymes, transporters and channel proteins, adhesion proteins, hemoglobins, cellular defense proteins, proteins of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, G-proteins of the Ras family, kinases, chaperone proteins, proteases, translation initiation factors, and others. In addition to the known proteins, there were 43 proteins whose identification was not determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据