4.7 Article

Quantitatively evaluating detoxification of the hepatotoxic microcystins through the glutathione and cysteine pathway in the cyanobacteria-eating bighead carp

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 61-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.03.004

关键词

Quantification; MCLR-GSH/Cys; MCRR-GSH/Cys; Bighead carp

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2008CB418101]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of China [31070457, 30700077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutathione (GSH) and cysteine (Cys) conjugation have long been recognized to be important in the detoxification of microcystins (MCs) in animal organs, however, studies quantitatively estimating this process are rare, especially those simultaneously determining multiple toxins and their metabolites. This paper, for the first time, simultaneously quantified MC-LR (leucine arginine), MC-RR (arginine arginine), MCLR-GSH/Cys and MCRR-GSH/Cys in the liver, kidney, intestine and muscle of the cyanobacteria-eating bighead carp i.p. injected with two doses of MCs using liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS). MCLR-Cys and MCRR-Cys content were much higher in kidney than in liver, intestine and muscle, suggesting the organotropism to kidney, while MCLR-GSH and MCRR-GSH were always below the detection limit. Bighead carp effectively metabolized MC-LR and MC-RR into the cysteine conjugates in kidney, as the ratios of MCLR-Cys to MC-LR and MCRR-Cys to MC-RR reached as high as 9.04 and 19.10, respectively. MC-LR and MC-RR were excreted mostly in the form of MCLR/RR-Cys rather than MCLR/RR-GSH, while MCs-GSH might act as mid-metabolites and changed to the more stable MCs-Cys rapidly. Cysteine conjugation of MCs appears to be an important biochemical mechanism for the cyanobacteria-eating fish to resist toxic cyanobacteria. A comparison of such detoxification mechanisms between fish and mammals would be interesting in the future studies. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据