4.3 Article

The oligodendroglial lineage marker OLIG2 is universally expressed in diffuse gliomas

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/63.5.499

关键词

antibody; astrocytoma; glioma; lineage; Olig2; progenitor

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA95616, CA57683] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD007466] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS4051, R01 NS047527] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and oligoastrocytomas, collectively referred to as diffuse gliomas, are the most common primary brain tumors. These tumors are classified by histologic similarity to differentiated astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, but this approach has major limitations in guiding modern treatment and research. Lineage markers represent a potentially useful adjunct to morphologic classification. The murine bHLH transcription factors Olig1 and Olig2 are expressed in neural progenitors and oligodendroglia and are essential for oligodendrocyte development. High OLIG expression alone has been proposed to distinguish oligodendrogliomas from astrocytomas, so we critically evaluated OLIG2 as a marker by immunohistochemical and oligonucleotide microarray analysis. OLIG2 protein is faithfully restricted to normal oligodendroglia and their progenitors in human brain. Immumohistochemical analysis of 180 primary, metastatic, and non-neural human tumors shows OLIG2 is highly expressed in all diffuse gliomas. Immunohistochemistry and microarray analyses demonstrate higher OLIG2 in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas versus glioblastomas, which are heterogeneous with respect to OLIG2 levels. OLIG2 protein expression is present but inconsistent and generally lower in most other brain tumors and is absent in non-neuroectodermal tumors. Overall, OLIG2 is a useful marker of diffuse gliomas as a class. However, expression heterogeneity of OLIG2 in astrocytomas precludes immunohistochemical classification of individual gliomas by OLIG2 alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据