4.7 Article

Raloxifene acutely suppresses ventricular myocyte contractility through inhibition of the L-type calcium current

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 142, 期 1, 页码 89-96

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705736

关键词

raloxifene; selective oestrogen receptor modulator; SERM; Ca2+ channel; calcium; excitation contraction coupling; EC coupling; cardiac myocyte; sarcoplasmic reticulum; action potential; ICI 182,780

向作者/读者索取更多资源

I The selective oestrogen (ER) receptor modulator, raloxifene, is widely used in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but may also possess cardioprotective properties. We investigated whether it directly suppresses myocyte contractility through Ca2+ channel antagonism in a similar way to 17beta-oestradiol. 2 Cell shortening and Ca2+ transients were measured in single guinea-pig ventricular myocytes field-stimulated (1 Hz, 37degreesC) in a superfusion chamber. Electrophysiological recordings were performed using single electrode voltage-clamp. 3 Raloxifene decreased cell shortening (EC50 2.4 muM) and the Ca2+ transient amplitude (EC50 6.4 muM) in a concentration-dependent manner. At a concentration of 1 muM, raloxifene produced a 33 +/- 2% (mean +/- s.e.m) and 24 +/- 2% reduction, respectively (P < 0.001, n = 14 for both parameters). 4 These inhibitory actions were not observed in myocytes that had been incubated with the specific antagonist, ICI 182,780 (10 mu M) (n = 11). 5 Raloxifene (1 mu M) shortened action potential durations at 50 and 90% repolarisation (P < 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively; n = 27) and decreased peak L-type Ca2+ current by 45%, from -5.1 +/- 0.5 PA/pF to -2.8 +/- 0.3 pA/pF (P < 0.001, n = 18). 6 Raloxifene did not significantly alter sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content, as assessed by integrating the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger currents following rapid caffeine application. 7 The present study provides evidence for direct inhibitory actions of raloxifene on ventricular myocyte contractility, mediated through Ca2+ channel antagonism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据