4.2 Article

Isolation of Serratia marcescens in the midgut of Rhodnius prolixus:: impact on the establishment of the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi in the vector

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY
卷 107, 期 1-2, 页码 89-96

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2004.04.007

关键词

Rhodnius prolixus; Trypanosoma cruzi; Chagas disease; hemolysis; trypanolytic activity; prodigiosin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of resident bacteria in the stomach of 5th-instar larvae of Rhodnius prolixus on the erythrocyte lysis and Trypanosoma cruzi infection were studied. The bacteria population increased approximately 10,000-fold after feeding. Hemolysis rose to approximately 28% within 24h postfeeding and then linearly grew until day 4 attaining almost 100%. The number of surviving Y strain of T cruzi in the stomach declined drastically, while the infection with Dm28c clone was maintained stable. Five days after feeding, few different types of bacterial colonies were obtained when stomach content suspensions were spread onto BHI agar plates. The hemolytic bacteria were isolated and identified as Serratia marcescens biotype Ala (referenced as RPH), which produces the pigment prodigiosin. In vitro experiments, comparing incubations of RPH with S. marcescens SM365. a prodigiosin pigment producer.. and S. marcescens DB11, a nonpigment variant, as a control, with erythrocytes and T cruzi demonstrated that: (i) at 30degreesC, SM365 and RPH diminished the populations of Y strain, but not DM28c clone, and DB11 was unable to lyse both T cruzi strains; (ii) at 0degreesC, SM263 and RPH killed the flagellates, but 131311 did not; and (iii) all three strains of S. marcescens were able to lyse erythrocytes. These results suggest that S. marcescens trypanolytic activity from the SM365 and RPH strains is distinct from the hemolytic activity and that prodigiosin is an important factor for the trypanolytic action of the bacteria. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据