4.6 Article

Reactive oxygen species induce RNA damage in human atherosclerosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 323-327

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2004.01343.x

关键词

atherosclerosis; gene expression; oxidative stress; reactive oxygen species; RNA damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced DNA damage has recently been identified in both human and experimental atherosclerosis. This study was undertaken to investigate whether RNA damage occurs in human atherosclerotic plaques and whether this could be related to oxidative stress. Materials and methods The integrity of total RNA isolated from carotid endarterectomy specimens (n = 20) and nonatherosclerotic mammary arteries (n = 20) was analyzed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). Oxidative modifications of RNA were detected by immunohistochemistry. Results Eleven out of 20 atherosclerotic plaques showed a significant reduction of the 18S/28S rRNA peaks and a shift in the RNA electropherogram to shorter fragment sizes. In contrast, all mammary arteries showed good-quality RNA with clear 18S and 28S rRNA peaks. Strong nuclear and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for oxidative damage marker 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-guanosine (8-oxoG) could be detected in the entire plaque in smooth muscle cells (SMCs), macrophages and endothelial cells, but not in SMCs of adjacent normal media or in mammary arteries. Cytoplasmic 8-oxoG staining in the plaque clearly diminished when tissue sections were pretreated with RNase A, suggesting oxidative base damage of RNA. In vitro treatment of total RNA with ROS-releasing compounds induced RNA degradation. Conclusion Both loss of RNA integrity and 8-oxoG oxidative modifications were found in human atherosclerotic plaques. Because RNA damage may affect in vitro transcript quantification, RT-PCR results must be interpreted cautiously if independent experimental validation (e.g. evaluation of RNA integrity) is lacking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据