4.7 Article

Phototoxicity of CdSe/ZnSe quantum dots with surface coatings of 3-mercaptopropionic acid or tri-n-octylphosphine oxide/gum arabic in Daphnia magna under environmentally relevant UV-B light

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 116-124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.022

关键词

CdSe/ZnSe quantum dot; Daphnia magna; Ultraviolet-B; Reactive oxygen species; Oxidative stress

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of Environment [091-091-081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential ecotoxicological consequences about semiconductor crystal nanoparticles (NPs) are a growing concern. However, our understanding of the mechanism of toxicity in NPs is very limited, especially under varying environmental conditions such as ultraviolet (UV) light. We performed an in vivo study employing Daphnia magna to evaluate the mechanism involved in toxicity of cadmium selenide/zinc selenide quantum dots (QDs) with two different organic coatings under an environmental level of UV-B light. We used QDs with mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and tri-n-octylphosphine oxide/gum arabic (GA) and measured their toxicities under an environmental level of UV-B light. Whole-body reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and mRNA expression level biomarkers, as well as acute toxicity, were measured in D. magna. With UV-B light, both cadmium (Cd) and GA-QD became more toxic in daphnids. The levels of small Cd molecules (<10 kDa cutoff) increased for GA-QD under UV-B; however, the observed acute lethal toxicity could not be explained by the measured Cd level. Under UV-B light, both Cd and GA-QD generated more ROS. In addition, the expression pattern of mRNAs specific to Cd exposure was not observed from GA-QD with or without UV-B light. These observations suggest that the phototoxicity of QDs may be explained not only by Cd release from the QD core but also by stability of surface coating characteristics and other potential causes such as ROS generation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据