4.6 Article

Synthesis and metabolism of leukotrienes in γ-glutamyl transpeptidase deficiency

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 900-904

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M300462-JLR200

关键词

cysteinyl leukotriene; gluthathion; 5-lipoxygenase pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leukotrienes (M) are active lipid mediators derived in the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. LTC4,, the primary cysteinyl LT, is cleaved by gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), resulting in LTD4. We studied the synthesis and metabolism of Us in three patients with GGT deficiency. LTs were analyzed in urine, plasma, and monocytes after HPLC separation by enzyme immunoassays, radioactivity detection, and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Analysis of LTs in urine revealed increased concentrations of LTC4 (12.8-17.9 nmol/mol creatinine; controls, <0.005 nmol/mol creatinine), whereas LTE4 was below the detection limit (<0.005 nmol/ mol creatinine; controls, 32.2 +/- 8.6 nmol/mol creatinine). In plasma of one patient, LTC4 was found to be increased (17.3 ng/ml; controls, 9.6 +/- 0.4 ng/ml), whereas LTD4 and LTE4 were below the detection limit (<0.005 ng/ml). LTB4 was found within normal ranges. In contrast to controls, the synthesis of LTD4 and LTE4 in stimulated monocytes was below the detection limit (< 0. 1 ng/ 10(6) cells; controls, 37.1 +/- 4.8 cells and 39.4 +/- 5.6 ng/10(6) cells, respectively). The formation of [H-3]LTD4 from [H-3]LTC4 in monocytes was completely deficient (<0.1%; controls, 85 +/- 7%).jlr Our data demonstrate a complete deficiency of LTD4 biosynthesis in patients with a genetic deficiency of GGT. GGT deficiency represents a new inborn error of cysteinyl IT synthesis and provides a unique model in which to study the pathobiological coherence of LT and glutathione metabolism.-Mayatepek, E.J G. Mull, T. Meissner, B. Assmamn,J. Hannuond,.J.. Zschocke, and W-D. Lehmann. Synthesis and metabolism of leukotrienes in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase deficiency. Lipid Res. 2004. 45: 900-904.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据