4.7 Article

Transcriptomic responses of European flounder (Platichthys flesus) to model toxicants

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 83-91

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.07.019

关键词

Flounder; Microarray; Fish; Ecotoxicogenomics; Cd; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; PCB; Oxidative stress; Lindane; Peroxisome proliferators

资金

  1. EU 'GENIPOL' [EKV-2001-0057]
  2. UK NERC [NE/C507661/1]
  3. BBSRC [6/JIF 13209, G.4500017]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C507688/1, NE/C507661/1, NE/C507702/1, NE/C50767X/1, NE/C507710/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temporal transcriptomic responses in liver of Platichthys flesus to model environmental pollutants were studied over a 16-day time span after intraperitoneal injection with cadmium chloride (50 mu g/kg in saline), 3-methylcholanthrene (25 mg/kg in olive oil), Aroclor 1254 (50 mg/kg in olive oil), tert-butylhydroperoxide (5 mg/kg in saline), Lindane (25 mg/kg in olive oil), perfluoro-octanoic acid (100 mg/kg in olive oil) and their vehicles, olive oil (1 ml/kg) or saline (0.9%). Statistical, gene ontology and supervised analysis clearly demonstrated the progression from acute effects, biological responses to and recovery from the treatments. Key biological processes disturbed by the individual treatments were characterised by gene ontology analyses and individual toxicant-responsive genes and pathways were identified by supervised analyses. Responses to the polyaromatic and chlorinated aromatic compounds showed a degree of commonality but were distinguishable and they were clearly segregated from the responses to the pro-oxidants cadmium and the organic hydroperoxide, as well as from the peroxisomal proliferator, perfluoro-octanoic acid. This study demonstrated the utility of the microarray technique in the identification of toxicant-responsive genes and in discrimination between modes of toxicant action. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据