4.6 Article

The coefficient of friction of Chrysotile gouge at seismogenic depths

期刊

INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGY REVIEW
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 385-398

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.2747/0020-6814.46.5.385

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report new strength data for the serpentine mineral chrysotile at effective normal stresses, sigma(n),, between 40 and 200 MPa in the temperature range 25degrees-280degreesC. Overall, the coefficient of friction, mu (= shear stress/effective normal stress) of water-saturated chrysotile gouge increases both with increasing temperature and (sigma) over bar (n) but the rates vary and the temperature-related increases begin, similar to100degreesC. As a result, a frictional strength minimum (mu = 0.1) occurs at low (sigma) over bar (n) at about 100degreesC. at Maximum strength (mu = 0.55) results from a combination of high normal stress and high temperature. The low-strength region is characterized by velocity strengthening and the high-strength region by velocity-weakening behavior. Thoroughly dried chrysotile has mu = 0.7 and is velocity-weakening. The frictional properties of chrysotile can be explained by its tendency to adsorb large amounts of water that acts as a lubricant during shear. The water is progressively driven off the fiber surfaces with increasing temperature and pressure, causing chrysotile to approach its dry strength. Depth Profiles for a chrysotile-lined fault constructed from these data would pass through a strength minimum at similar to3 km depth, where sliding should be stable. Below that depth, strength increases rapidly as does the tendency for unstable (seismic) slip. Such a trend would not have been predicted from the room-temperature data. These results therefore illustrate the potential hazards of extrapolating room-temperature friction data to predict fault zone behavior at depth. This depth profile for chrysotile is Consistent with the pattern of slip oil the Hayward fault. which creeps aseismically at shallow depths but which may be locked below 5 km depth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据