4.3 Article

Mitochondrial phylogeny and systematics of baboons (Papio)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 17-27

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10340

关键词

taxonomy; primate; cercopithecine; mtDNA; ND4; ND5

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR13986] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL28972] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Baboons (Papio, s.s.) comprise a series of parapatric allotaxa (subspecies or closely related species) widely distributed in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite extensive studies of their ecology, morphology, and behavior, disagreement about their phylogenetic relationships continues, as expressed in the current coexistence of at least three major, competing taxonomic treatments. To help resolve this situation, we sequenced similar to900 bases of mitochondrial DNA of 40 individuals from five of the widely recognized major allotaxa. Total sequence diversity (>5%) is high compared to most primate species. Major mitochondrial. clades correspond to recognized allotaxa, with the important exception that haplotypes from yellow and olive baboons form a single, monophyletic clade within which the two allotaxa do not comprise mutually exclusive clusters. The major clades fall unambiguously into the pattern: (chacma (Guinea (hamadryas (yellow + olive)))). This phylogeny does not support taxonomies that oppose hamadryas to all other baboons (desert vs. savanna), but is compatible with the view that all definable allotaxa should be recognized as coordinates, either as phylogenetic species or biological subspecies. The close relationship and unsegregated distribution of haplotypes from Kenyan and Tanzanian yellow and olive baboons are unexplained, but may reflect introgression across the documented hybrid zone. The overall phylogeny, when combined with paleontological data, suggests a southern African origin for extant Papio baboons, with all extant lineages sharing a common mitochondrial ancestor at approximately 1.8 Ma. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据