4.5 Article

Function and clustered expression of MaxiK channels in cerebral myocytes remain intact with aging

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 831-839

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2004.01.011

关键词

aging; smooth muscle; arterial myocytes; BK channels; cluster expression; brain

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL71824, HL54970, HL47382] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of stroke increases significantly in the aging population where stroke related deaths boost at > 75 years and survivors are often permanently disabled. Aging is known to decrease cerebral blood flow likely due to an increase in arterial tone. Although MaxiK channels are key regulators of cerebral arterial tone their pattern of expression and function in cerebral blood vessels during aging is unknown. Using specific antibodies against the a-subunit of MaxiK channels and current recordings, we now demonstrate that in aging cerebral myocytes, MaxiK channels remain healthy. Furthermore, we show for the first time that in the vasculature, MaxiK channels are expressed in clusters. Clusters have an estimated radius of similar to200 nm in young rats (3-5 month old Fisher 344 rats) which remains normal in old (25-30 month rats) cerebral myocytes. Consistent with a healthy MaxiK channel expression in old cerebral arteries, MaxiK current density, kinetics and Ca2+ sensitivity were practically identical in young and old myocytes. Sensitivity to nanomolar concentrations of dehydrosoyasaponin-I that activates channels formed by alpha and beta subunits is also the same in young and old myocytes. These results demonstrate that MaxiK channels maintain normal expression during cerebral aging which is in sharp contrast to our previous finding of loss of expression in aging coronary arteries. It seems therefore, that cerebral myocytes have developed a protective anti-aging mechanism leading to the continued expression of MaxiK channels. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据