4.4 Article

Variability of carbon dioxide flux from tropical (Cerrado) hydroelectric reservoirs

期刊

AQUATIC SCIENCES
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 283-293

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-010-0140-0

关键词

CO2 emission; Hydroelectric reservoirs; Spatial heterogeneity; GHG; Tropical freshwaters

资金

  1. FURNAS Centrais Eletricas S.A.
  2. National Council of Research and Development (CNPq) Brazil
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0917858] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroelectric reservoirs generate energy without significant combustion of fossil fuels. However, these systems can, potentially, emit greenhouse gases (GHG's) at a rate which may be significant at the global scale, and, possible, co-equal, per kilowatt-hour, to that from conventional coal or oil-fired systems. Although much of the new construction of hydroelectric reservoirs is in the tropics, most of the data on GHG emissions comes from temperate regions. Further, much of the existing data on reservoir gas emissions comes from single sites, usually near the terminal dams. Large tropical reservoirs often involve the impoundments of river systems with complex morphology which in turn can cause spatial heterogeneity in gas flux. We evaluated spatial and seasonal variability in CO2 concentrations and gas flux for five large (50-1,400 km(2)) reservoirs in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Most of data set (87% of all measurements) showed CO2 supersaturation and net efflux to the atmosphere. There was as much or more variation in pCO(2) over space and among seasons. The large studied reservoirs showed different zones in terms of CO2 emission because those fluxes are dependent on flooded biomass, watershed input of organic matter and dam operation regime. Here we demonstrate that the reservoirs in the Brazilian Cerrado have low rates of CO2 emissions compared to existing global comparisons. Our results suggest that ignoring the spatial variability can lead to more than 25% error in total system gas flux.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据